On 04.01.2011 21:43, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Magnus Hagander<mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 20:28, Josh Berkus<j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
hmmm I think "pg_stat_standby" might be more relevant but I definitely
agree something more newbie appropriate is in order.
I'd be fine with that name, too.
That seems kind of backwards though - given that the view only
contains data on the master...
I think pg_stat_replication is better than pg_stat_standby, but I'm
still not convinced we shouldn't go with the obvious
pg_stat_walsenders.
How about pg_stat_replication_activity? If I understood correctly, the
view is similar to pg_stat_activity, but displays information about
connected standbys rather than regular backends. It's a bit long name,
though.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
