On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> To my way of thinking, pg_stat_walsender and pg_stat_walreceiver would >> be more clear than pg_stat_replication_master and >> pg_stat_replication_slave. > > Let's commit it so that some of us can get a look at the data it > contains, and then we can fix the name during beta.
Well, the first half is committed, under the name pg_stat_replication. So go look at that, for starters... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
