Dne 7.1.2011 20:56, Jim Nasby napsal(a): > On Jan 7, 2011, at 5:32 AM, t...@fuzzy.cz wrote: >> Another thing I'm not sure about is where to store those intermediate >> stats (used to get the current estimate, updated incrementally). I was >> thinking about pg_stats but I'm not sure it's the right place - depending >> on the algorithm, this may be a fet kilobytes up to several megabytes. And >> it's not needed except when updating it. Any ideas? > > If you're using it essentially as a queue, maybe a resource fork makes sense?
A resource fork? Not sure what you mean, could you describe it in more detail? regards Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers