On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > or we could hack eqsel() to bound the no-stats estimate to a bit less > than 1.
This seems like a pretty sensible thing to do. I can't immediately imagine a situation in which 1.0 is a sensible selectivity estimate in the no-stats case and 0.90 (say) is a major regression. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
