Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> writes:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 14:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It really shouldn't be useful to include those. Attend what it says in
>> the fine manual for CREATE OPERATOR CLASS:
> Hm, that is not what I see when reading the source.
> There can exist several entries in pg_amproc for one operator family
> with the same short_number and function (both name and types).
We're cheating in a small number of places by using a binary-compatible
hash function to implement hashing for a datatype other than the one
it's declared to work on. I don't think that the existence of that hack
means that getObjectDescription should bloat the descriptions of every
amproc entry with generally-useless information.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
