Ron Mayer <rm...@cheapcomplexdevices.com> wrote: > That Survey's missing one important distinction for that > discussion. > > Do you take the the current survey answer > > "Yes, we depend on it for production code" > > to imply > > "Yes, we depend on actual real SERIALIZABLE transactions in > production and will panic if you tell us we're not getting > that" > > or > > "Yes, we depend on the legacy not-quite SERIALIZABLE > transactions in production and don't want real serializable > transactions" Yeah, I was reluctant to reply to that survey because we rely on it to the extent that it works now, but it would not break anything if we dropped in a real SERIALIZABLE implementation. I fear that choosing the "depend on it" answer would imply "don't want changes". -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
