Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be > renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream > is a lot more specific than that)
What I like about streamrecv is it's fairly clear which end of the connection it's supposed to be used on. I find "pg_basebackup" quite lacking from that perspective, and the same for the names above. Or are you proposing to merge the send and receive sides into one executable? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers