On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 20:31, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be >> renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream >> is a lot more specific than that) > > What I like about streamrecv is it's fairly clear which end of the > connection it's supposed to be used on. I find "pg_basebackup" > quite lacking from that perspective, and the same for the names > above. Or are you proposing to merge the send and receive sides > into one executable?
No, the sending side is in walsender. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers