On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 20:31, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
>> Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be
>> renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream
>> is a lot more specific than that)
>
> What I like about streamrecv is it's fairly clear which end of the
> connection it's supposed to be used on.  I find "pg_basebackup"
> quite lacking from that perspective, and the same for the names
> above.  Or are you proposing to merge the send and receive sides
> into one executable?

No, the sending side is in walsender.


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to