On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:52:09PM -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote: > I think we still need the vxid. It shows in the pg_locks view, and > we might possibly need it to find the right process to cancel once we > have some way to do that. But there's no point with having the tag > level anymore.
Oh, right, we do use it to generate pg_lock_status. I forgot about that particular tendril of code that extends outside of predicate.c. > Dan, if you're not already working on these, I'll take them, so you > can focus on 2PC. All yours! But if you feel like renaming SerializableXactHashLock, please hold off to prevent conflicts with my 2PC changes. Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
