Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> No, I don't think so. Has any evidence been submitted that that part of
>> the patch is of benefit?
> I think you might be mixing up what's actually in the patch with
> another idea that was proposed but isn't actually in the patch. The
> patch itself does nothing controversial.
Oh, I misread Itagaki-san's comment to imply that that *was* in the
patch. Maybe I should go read it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
