On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> No, I don't think so. Has any evidence been submitted that that part of >>> the patch is of benefit? > >> I think you might be mixing up what's actually in the patch with >> another idea that was proposed but isn't actually in the patch. The >> patch itself does nothing controversial. > > Oh, I misread Itagaki-san's comment to imply that that *was* in the > patch. Maybe I should go read it.
Perhaps. :-) While you're at it you might commit it. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
