On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> So I don't want to give up the details of the function >>> or operator. But sticking them at the end after a colon might make it >>> clearer that the func/operator is referenced by the amproc or amop >>> entry, but is not the same thing. > >> That seems like an improvement over the status quo, so do you want to >> go ahead and do that? > > Are you voting to commit the patch I presented plus that change,
Yeah. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
