On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of dom ene 30 23:37:51 -0300 2011:
>
>> Unless I'm missing something, making autovacuum.c call
>> ConditionalLockRelationOid() is not going to work, because the vacuum
>> transaction isn't started until we get all the way down to
>> vacuum_rel().
>
> Maybe we need ConditionalLockRelationOidForSession or something like
> that?

That'd be another way to go, if there are objections to what I've
implemented here.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to