On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The extensions patch currently records that an object is part of an > extension by making a pg_depend entry with deptype 'i' (INTERNAL). > While that has the behavior we want, I wonder whether it wouldn't > be smarter in the long run to invent a new deptype for this purpose.
+1. > If we go with a new deptype, I was thinking of using 'm' (macro > DEPENDENCY_MEMBER) but am not set on that. Have we been using any > particular term to refer to the objects that belong to an extension? DEPENDENCY_EXTENSION? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
