Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Given that we've decided to run the modifying sub-queries all with > the same command counter ID, they are logically executing "in > parallel". > Just run the main plan and let it pull tuples from the CTEs as > needed. On the face of it, that sounds like it has another benefit you didn't mention -- it sounds like it's much more conducive to allowing parallel processing, if (when?) we eventually move in that direction. It might even be a good case for an initial, limited implementation. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
