On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:25 AM, marcin mank <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Farina <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Right now, as it stands, the syncrep patch will be happy as soon as
>> the data has been fsynced to either B or A-prime; I don't think we can
>> guarantee at any point that A-prime can become the leader, and feed B.
>>
>
> - start A` up, replicating from A
> - shutdown B (now A nad A` are synchronous)
> now real quick:
> - shut down A
> - shut down A`
> -change configuration
> -start up A`
> -start up B
>
> Doesn`t this work?
This dance does work, but it would be very nice to not have to take
the standby ('B' in my case) offline.
--
fdr
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
