> > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jan Urbański <wulc...@wulczer.org> > > > wrote: > > > > On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote: > > > > > > [a bug that we don't know how to fix] > > > > > From this discussion I gather that we have a problem here that we > > > don't exactly know how to fix, so I'm inclined to suggest that we > > > mark this Returned with Feedback in the CommitFest and instead add > > > it to the TODO. Since this is a pre-existing bug and not a new > > > regression, it should not be something we hold up beta for. > > > > I'm officially at a loss on how to fix that bug without some serious > > gutting of how PL/Python arguments work. If someone comes up with a > > brilliant way to solve this problem, we can commit it after beta, or > > even during the 9.2 cycle (should the brilliant solution be > > backpatcheable). > > Is this discussion related to the following todo item: > > Create a new restricted execution class that will allow passing > function arguments in as locals. Passing them as globals means > functions cannot be called recursively.
Yep, the bug it's more or less an emanation of this problem. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
