2011/2/26 Jan Urbański <wulc...@wulczer.org>:
> ----- Original message -----
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jan Urbański <wulc...@wulczer.org>
>> wrote:
>> > On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > > On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> > > > [a bug that we don't know how to fix]
>> From this discussion I gather that we have a problem here that we
>> don't exactly know how to fix, so I'm inclined to suggest that we mark
>> this Returned with Feedback in the CommitFest and instead add it to
>> the TODO.   Since this is a pre-existing bug and not a new regression,
>> it should not be something we hold up beta for.
> I'm officially at a loss on how to fix that bug without some serious gutting 
> of how PL/Python arguments work. If someone comes up with a brilliant way to 
> solve this problem, we can commit it after beta, or even during the 9.2 cycle 
> (should the brilliant solution be backpatcheable).

Is this discussion related to the following todo item:

Create a new restricted execution class that will allow passing
function arguments in as locals. Passing them as globals means
functions cannot be called recursively.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to