On tis, 2011-03-01 at 21:10 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote: > So you end up with a context message saying "PL/Python function %s" > and a detail message with the saved detail (if it's present) *and* the > traceback. The problem is that the name of the function is already in > the traceback, so there's no need for the context *if* there's a > traceback present.
I wouldn't actually worry about that bit of redundancy so much. Getting proper context for nested calls is much more important. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers