On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote: >> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix >> >>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info. >> >> >> >> Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also needed some fixes, >> >> so those have been included in this new patch. >> > >> > I don't think it's necessary to cross-post these emails.... >> >> I've received conflicting information in the past on this, but I'm >> assuming you're suggesting to send this just to the -docs list in >> future? > > As I'm putting together the patches section for the PostgreSQL Weekly > News, it helps me *enormously* to have only one list I need to check, > so at least for me, it's an enormous help to have all patches at least > CC'd, or better still, only posted, to -hackers.
I cross-posted as it's a docs change, but I want to invite the critical eye of those who dev'd it. Okay, so doc patches should go exclusively to the -hackers list? Last time I recall some disparity surrounding what I should be doing. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
