On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >>> Well, a prerequisite for cutting an alpha is closing the >>> commitfest, which at this point reduces to deciding what we are >>> going to do with the plpython traceback patch. > >> AFAIK, there's nothing particularly special about that patch, >> other than that the author chose to move it back from Returned >> with Feedback to some other status. > > I don't see it having been in Returned with Feedback. The reviewer > moved it to Ready for Committer, committers raised issues and moved > it to Waiting for Author, and the author submitted a new patch and > moved it back to Ready for Committer.
Sorry, you're right. Still, as happy as I am that we've made so much progress with PL/python (and other things) this CommitFest, I think it's time to pick a date and time to ship alpha4 and call this one good. If the patch makes it, great; if not, oh well. We can't keep letting this drag out. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
