Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/21/2011 09:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net>  writes:
> >>> I propose that we add the following test for this case:
> >>>      AC_CHECK_HEADER(Python.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([header file<Python.h>
> >>>      is required for Python])])
> >> You'd need to pay attention to python_includespec, but otherwise seems
> >> reasonable.
> > Did this get done?  If so, I don't see it.
> 
> Oh, no. It skipped my TODO list. I'll try to get it done in the next day 
> or so.

I have added this to the 9.1 open items list:

        http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Open_Items#Code_Issues


-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to