Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 02/21/2011 09:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> writes: > >>> I propose that we add the following test for this case: > >>> AC_CHECK_HEADER(Python.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([header file<Python.h> > >>> is required for Python])]) > >> You'd need to pay attention to python_includespec, but otherwise seems > >> reasonable. > > Did this get done? If so, I don't see it. > > Oh, no. It skipped my TODO list. I'll try to get it done in the next day > or so.
I have added this to the 9.1 open items list: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Open_Items#Code_Issues -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers