Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 02/21/2011 09:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net>  writes:
> > I propose that we add the following test for this case:
> > AC_CHECK_HEADER(Python.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([header file<Python.h>
> > is required for Python])])
> > You'd need to pay attention to python_includespec, but otherwise seems
> > reasonable.
> > Did this get done?  If so, I don't see it.
> >> 
> >> Oh, no. It skipped my TODO list. I'll try to get it done in the next day 
> >> or so.
> 
> > I have added this to the 9.1 open items list:
> 
> >     http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Open_Items#Code_Issues
> 
> Waste of time, because that got done some time ago.

OK, thanks.  Removed.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to