On 12 March 2011 13:59, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> On 3/12/11, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> >> People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the >> >> attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No >> >> initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment. >> > >> >> + "COMMENT ON DATABASE template0 IS 'only used by pg_dump';\n", >> > >> > No objection to the concept, but the actual text of this comment is >> > approximately 100% wrong. >> > >> >> I'd like to lodge a formal objection to the use of the word >> 'approximately' in the above comment. > > OK, funny guys. ;-) Can someone give me the right text. Obviously I > don' know what template0 is used for either. Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?
'original template database' ? -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
