On lör, 2011-03-12 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Shouldn't the "postgres" database get a comment too, while we're at > it? Perhaps "default database to connect to"?
That's not actually true, though. Maybe it's the "default database used by administration programs"? In practice it might be "some otherwise unused database that's occasionally useful". ;-) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
