2011/3/22 Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu>:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jim Nasby <j...@nasby.net> wrote:
>> Has anyone looked at the overhead of measuring how long IO requests to the 
>> kernel take? If we did that not only could we get an idea of what our IO 
>> workload looked like, we could also figure out whether a block came out of 
>> cache or not. That information could potentially be useful to the planner, 
>> but even if the database couldn't use that knowledge itself it would be a 
>> damn useful statistic to have... IMHO, far more useful than our current hit 
>> rate statistics.
>>
>
> I've done this -- actually better, I used mincore to actually check
> whether the block was in cache before issuing the read -- but it turns
> out you can't get what you're looking for this way.

The linux fincore() syscall never get in the kernel, maybe something
to revive...

>
> It turns out when you do this you see one block being read from disk
> followed by n blocks that all appear to be cache hits. Because they've
> been prefetched by the kernel.

I did the same, I now believe that it is not very important to have
the very exact numbers.
Prefetech blocks *are* in memory when we request them, the first read
access read more than one block because the cost is the same.

>
> What you end up with is actually something like the number of iops
> which is also an interesting measure but not really what you were
> looking for.
>
> My getrusage patch, which I should still dig out though it's rather
> too late to be committing now unless someone tells me otherwise, would
> tell you how much i/o a plan node actually did. But you won't know
> which blocks did the i/o since I was only tracking totals for the plan
> node. That's probably what you're looking for here.

Please show us the patch :)


-- 
Cédric Villemain               2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to