On Mar 27, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > That doesn't mean we shouldn't do this (haven't reconsidered the whole > thread) - but it doesn't solve the issue I originally raised.
I'm somewhat inclined to just remove this from the list of open items. It doesn't seem clear what the action item is here, or even that there is one, so holding up beta for it doesn't seem right. When/if we figure out what needs to be done, we can revisit the issue. Anyone disagree? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
