On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > OK, just keep going below 100: > > 105 -> 5 > 104 -> 4 > 103 -> 3 > 102 -> max_xid > 101 -> max_xid - 1 > 100 -> max_xid - 2 > 99 -> max_id > 98 -> max_id -1 > > Wouldn't you rather: > > 105 -> 5 > 104 -> 4 > 103 -> 3 > 102 -> 3 > 101 -> 3 > 100 -> 3 > 99 -> max_id > 98 -> max_id -1
Oh, quite right. Sorry I missed that. I suppose if we wanted to fix this for real, we'd want to get: 105->5 104->4 103->3 102->max_xid 101->max_xid-1 100->max_xid-2 99->max_xid-3 98->max_xid-4 But it doesn't seem worth getting excited about. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
