On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Dan Ports <d...@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > I see Robert committed that one already. If there's a consensus that > omitting the pid for committed transactions is the right thing to do, > I'm happy to put together a patch. I think that is a better approach > than trying to keep it after commit until the connection closes, but > all of this is sufficiently minor that it's probably not worth worrying > much about.
I couldn't really figure out why that would be better, but if there's a reason I'm fine with it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
