On 04/10/2011 09:47 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net>  wrote:
Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a database name, in 
Is it worth backporting this change to 9.0?

I didn't because it's a behaviour change, but arguably it's just us being ever so slightly more permissive, and nothing that now works would change in any way, so we possibly could.



Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to