On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:18 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>> 2. The typed tables stuff vs. pg_upgrade still needs work. I would be >>> just as happy if Tom or Peter wanted to fix this, mostly for fear of >>> getting flak over the details of the fixes, but if not I will do it. >> >> Noah Misch is hot on the trail of that one. > > Yes, but inasmuch as he is not a committer, someone who is will need > to be involved. I dealt with the prerequisite ALTER TABLE .. OF/NOT > OF patch last night, but the related pg_dump patch that actually fixes > the problem still needs to be looked at, and the earliest (and > probably only) time that I can potentially do that is Monday. So it > would be great if you or someone else could pick it up.
Well, I addressed most of the remaining open items today, but not this one. Hopefully, someone else can pick it up, because I'm leaving end of day tomorrow for a week's vacation in Germany. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
