On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:32:16PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On tor, 2011-04-07 at 23:02 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Seeing that 9.1-to-9.1 pg_upgrade has apparently been broken for months, > > it would probably be good to have some kind of automatic testing for it. > > Attached is something I hacked together that at least exposes the > > current problems, easily available by typing "make check" and waiting. > > It does not yet fully implement the full testing procedure in the > > TESTING file, in particular the diffing of the dumps (well, because you > > can't get there yet). > > > > Is that something that people are interested in refining? > > > > (I think it would even be possible under this setup to create special > > regression test cases that are only run under the pg_upgrade test run, > > to exercise particularly tricky upgrade cases.) > > Now that this is bound to be fixed, here is an updated script that runs > the entire test procedure including diffing the dumps at the end.
Enthusiastic +1 for this concept. There's at least one rough edge: it fails if you have another postmaster running on port 5432. Thanks, nm -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers