On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:07:45PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-04-27 at 18:14 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Enthusiastic +1 for this concept.  There's at least one rough edge: it 
> > fails if
> > you have another postmaster running on port 5432.
> This has now been addressed: pg_upgrade accepts PGPORT settings.
> Attached is a slightly updated patch runs the test suite with a port of
> 65432, which you can override by setting PGPORT yourself.
> Anyway, is this something that people want in the repository?  It's not
> as polished as the pg_regress business, but it is definitely helpful.

I'd like it.  We've had bugs sit for months that would have been found
immediately by a buildfarm member running this test.  Having it in the
repository at least opens up that possibility.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to