On Apr 30, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder though if it wouldn't be smarter > to insist that autovacuum acquire some lock on the main table > when processing a toast table.
Boy, it sure seems better to avoid the above if we can. So +1 for the other way around - make CLUSTER lock the TOAST table if it cares about a VACUUM happening there. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
