On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> > ... Maybe someone out there is under the impression >> > that I get high off of rejecting patches; but the statistics you cite >> > from the CF app don't exactly support the contention that I'm going >> > around looking for reasons to reject things, or if I am, I'm doing a >> > pretty terrible job finding them. >> >> Hm ... there are people out there who think *I* get high off rejecting >> patches. I have a t-shirt to prove it. But I seem to be pretty >> ineffective at it too, judging from these numbers. > > Late reply, but almost all the things Tom rejects I would have rejected > too.
Well, I think I've been guilty more than once of leaning on Tom to try to get him to accept patches that he might've been inclined to reject. I think that my standards for code quality are similar to Tom's (though sometimes I let through things he would have caught, woops) but I think I am more inclined to commit feature changes that he might not find entirely worthwhile. Like Tom, I'm reasonably wary of random knickknacks that are extremely special-purpose or will slow down common cases, but on the average I think I'm slightly more new-feature-positive than he is. Not without some exceptions, of course. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
