On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Hmmm, do we really need to WAL log freezing? > > Can we break down freezing into a 2 stage process, so that we can have > first stage as a lossy operation and a second stage that is WAL > logged?
That might solve the relfrozenxid problem - set the bits in the heap, sync the heap, then update relfrozenxid once the heap is guaranteed safely on disk - but it again seems problematic for Hot Standby. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
