On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:33 AM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: >> At the developer meeting last week: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting there >> was an initial schedule for 9.2 hammered out and dutifully >> transcribed at >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.2_Development_Plan , >> and the one part I wasn't sure I had written down correctly I see >> Robert already fixed. >> >> There was a suggestion to add some publicity around the schedule for >> this release. > > Already started. :) > > http://www.postgresql.org/community/weeklynews/pwn20110522 > >> There's useful PR value to making it more obvious to >> people that the main development plan is regular and time-based, >> even if the release date itself isn't fixed. The right time to make >> an initial announcement like that is "soon", particularly if a goal >> here is to get more submitted into the first 9.2 CF coming in only a >> few weeks. Anyone have changes to suggest before this starts >> working its way toward an announcement? > > I thought we'd agreed on the timing for the first CF, and that I was > to announce it in the PostgreSQL Weekly News, so I did just that.
We talked about doing a separate -announce post just for this item, and there seemed to be some support for that. I'm OK with either way, though. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
