On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 14:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Attached are two versions of a patch to fix this. The second one > modifies the code that tracks what's "pending" as per the above thought. > I'm not entirely sure which one I like better ... any comments?
I think I'm missing something simple: if it's not in the pending list, what prevents systable_beginscan() from using it? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers