On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 14:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Attached are two versions of a patch to fix this. The second one
> modifies the code that tracks what's "pending" as per the above thought.
> I'm not entirely sure which one I like better ... any comments?
I think I'm missing something simple: if it's not in the pending list,
what prevents systable_beginscan() from using it?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
