Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 02:17:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Attached are two versions of a patch to fix this. The second one
>> modifies the code that tracks what's "pending" as per the above thought.
>> I'm not entirely sure which one I like better ... any comments?
> +1 for the second approach. It had bothered me that SetReindexProcessing()
> and
> ResetReindexProcessing() manipulated one thing, but ReindexIsProcessingIndex()
> checked something else besides. (That's still technically true, but the
> overall
> effect seems more natural.)
OK, done that way.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
