On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is this profile expected?
I've certainly seen profiles before where the catcache overhead was significant. I don't think that I've seen SearchCatCache() quite this high on any of the profiling I've done, but then again I don't tend to profile the same things you do, so maybe that's not surprising. I think the interesting question is probably "where are all those calls coming from?" and "can we optimize any of them away?" rather than "how do we make SearchCatCache() run faster?". I would be willing to bet money that the latter is largely an exercise in futility. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
