On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, <karave...@mail.bg> wrote: > clients beta2 +fastlock +lazyvzid local socket > 8 76064 92430 92198 106734 > 16 64254 90788 90698 105097 > 32 56629 88189 88269 101202 > 64 51124 84354 84639 96362 > 128 45455 79361 79724 90625 > 256 40370 71904 72737 82434
I'm having trouble interpreting this table. Column 1: # of clients Column 2: TPS using 9.1beta2 unpatched Column 3: TPS using 9.1beta2 + fastlock patch Column 4: TPS using 9.1beta2 + fastlock patch + vxid patch Column 5: ??? At any rate, that is a big improvement on a system with only 8 cores. I would have thought you would have needed ~16 cores to get that much speedup. I wonder if the -M prepared makes a difference ... I wasn't using that option. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
