2011/6/29, Florian Pflug <[email protected]>: > Secondly, there is little point in having an type XML if we > don't actually ensure that values of that type can only contain > well-formed XML.
+1. The fact that XPATH() must return a type that cannot depend on the given expression (even if it is a constant string) may be unfortunate, but returning XML-that-is-not-quite-XML sounds way worse to me. Nicolas -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
