On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> AFAICS we could get rid of WalSndDelay: there is no longer any reason
>> for the walsender loop to wake up unless it's received a latch event.
>> (Its WaitLatch call is missing WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH right now, but that
>> is easily fixed.)  Is anyone sufficiently attached to that GUC to not
>> want to see it go away?
>
> Please remove.

+1!

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to