On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> AFAICS we could get rid of WalSndDelay: there is no longer any reason >> for the walsender loop to wake up unless it's received a latch event. >> (Its WaitLatch call is missing WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH right now, but that >> is easily fixed.) Is anyone sufficiently attached to that GUC to not >> want to see it go away? > > Please remove.
+1! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
