> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> > Yes. It also caches an expected security label when a client being
> > labeled as "scontext" tries to execute a procedure being labeled as
> > "tcontext", to reduce number of system call invocations on fmgr_hook
> > and needs_fmgr_hook.
> > If the expected security label is not same with "scontext", it means
> > the procedure performs as a trusted procedure that switches security
> > label of the client during its execution; like a security invoker
> > function.
> > A pair of security labels are the only factor to determine whether the
> > procedure is a trusted-procedure, or not. Thus, it is suitable to
> > cache in userspace avc.
> I've committed this, but I still think it would be helpful to revise
> that comment.  The turn "boosted up" is not very precise or
> informative.  Could you submit a separate, comment-only patch to
> improve this?
OK, Please wait for a few days.

NEC Europe Ltd, SAP Global Competence Center
KaiGai Kohei <kohei.kai...@emea.nec.com>

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to