On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Kohei Kaigai <kohei.kai...@emea.nec.com> wrote:
>> I've committed this, but I still think it would be helpful to revise
>> that comment.  The turn "boosted up" is not very precise or
>> informative.  Could you submit a separate, comment-only patch to
>> improve this?
> I tried to put more detailed explanation about the logic of do { ... } while
> loop of sepgsql_avc_check_valid and the cache field of new security label to
> be switched on execution of the procedure. Is it helpful?

I edited this and committed it along with a bunch of further
wordsmithing on the comments in that file.  Please let me know if you
see any isuses.


Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to