Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >>> Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > >>>> Please lets not waste effort on refactoring efforts in mid dev cycle. > > > >>> Say what? ?When else would you have us do it? > > > >> When else would you have us develop? > > > > In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development. ?I find the > > distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to > > make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety. ?Any > > significant development change carries a risk of breakage. > > You clearly have the bit between your teeth on this.
So I guess Tom, Robert Haas, and I all have bits then. > That doesn't make it worthwhile or sensible though. We are not saying do it now. We are disputing your suggestion that now is not a good time --- there is a difference. > I've offered to do it slowly and carefully over time, but that seems > not enough for some reason. What is the real reason for this? Oh, if we told you, then, well, you would know, and the big secret would be out. (Hint: when three people are telling you the same thing, odds are there is not some secret motive.) -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers