Simon, Robert, Bruce, Tom, >>>> >>> Say what? When else would you have us do it? >> > >>> >> When else would you have us develop? >> > >> > In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development. I find the >> > distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to >> > make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety. Any >> > significant development change carries a risk of breakage. > You clearly have the bit between your teeth on this. > > That doesn't make it worthwhile or sensible though.
The above really seems like a non-argument over trivial wording of stuff. Can we please give each other the benefit of the doubt and not read objectionable content into offhand comments? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers