On 08/08/2011 07:50 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Andres Freund<and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
If its ok I will write a mail to lkml referencing this thread and your numbers
inline (with attribution obviously).
That would be great. Please go ahead.
I've just stumbled across this thread on lkml 
"Improve lseek scalability v3".
and I thought to ping pgsql hackers list
just in case, more to the point they're
asking "are there any real workloads which care
[Make generic lseek lockless safe]"
maybe I've got it wrong but it seems somewhat
related to what has been discussed here and
also in Robert Haas's "Linux and glibc Scalability"
blog post .
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: