On 19 September 2011 16:10, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
> On 19 September 2011 15:54, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> The main problem here is that the sort of hardware commonly used for
>>> production database servers doesn't have any serious enough GPU to support
>>> CUDA/OpenCL available
>> Of course that could change if adding a GPU would help Postgres... I
>> would expect it to help mostly for data warehouse batch query type
>> systems, especially ones with very large i/o subsystems that can
>> saturate the memory bus with sequential i/o. "Run your large batch
>> queries twice as fast by adding a $400 part to your $40,000 server"
>> might be a pretty compelling sales pitch :)
>> That said, to help in the case I described you would have to implement
>> the tapesort algorithm on the GPU as well. I expect someone has
>> implemented heaps for CUDA/OpenCL already though.
> I seem to recall a paper on such a thing by Carnegie Mellon
> University.  Can't remember where I saw it though.

Found it! 

Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to