Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> As a stopgap, what about removing sepgsql from the list of contrib
>> modules tested by "make -C contrib check"?
> +1.
> In fact, I've been wondering if we ought to go a step further and not
> recurse into the sepgsql directory for *any* of the targets.
Hmm. That would be a lot cleaner than the alternatives I've thought
of so far for recursing for only some targets.
> Then we
> could get rid of the associated configure option, which no longer
> serves any other purpose, and just say that if you want to build (or
> regression-test) sepgsql, well, you gotta go to that directory and do
> it by hand.
The trouble with getting rid of configure support is that we lose the
opportunity to verify that you have a new-enough version of libselinux.
That's maybe not a big deal, but it's a point worth noting.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
